Real women's driving skills. The world needs to forget about that stupid male opinion that goes "women can't drive". We are better drivers than them, so much that the comparison is practically just a favour to true science. Actually, if you can't drive you're not a real woman. Maybe men are promoting autonomous vehicles just so we won't be able to prove them wrong behind the steering wheel. We must not allow that fashion to grow. Real women buy cars with all of the following features:
Manual transmission. This does NOT include "sequential" gearboxes with "manual" mode. The real woman doesn't need robots for shifting.
No "stability programmes" or "antispins". The real woman is more than capable of efficient accelerator modulation and does not need electronics to do that.
No "power steering". The real woman will still be able to turn the steering wheel with her little finger. My car is a Lada 2105. Drive one if you ever have the chance. I love its genuine feel.
Low overall height. The real woman doesn't need to follow the SUV trend. A car with good mechanical handling is essential for an enjoyable yet safe drive on a tight, technical b-road, or on track.
Proper engine sound. There is no joy in driving without the right mechanical soundtrack. Don't get fooled by the electric car fashion. I believe the future is biofuel as it keeps the sound and increases output potential. Yes, it is also good for reducing pollution, but petrol cars are already not the heaviest polluter. I suspect that must be weapon industry, make-up industry, or maybe smoke industry. The real woman does care what a nature she will hand to the next real women, but doesn't fall for marketing tricks.
But most importantly, the real woman goes for test drives before she decides which car to buy. The real woman knows how to get a feel for what she's driving and its mechanical quality. Drive a variety of different brands and models on a tight b-road and you'll see. Just don't be an obstacle to other drivers. The real woman can go faster than men without causing the serious accidents men tend to cause. The two main reasons are her better reflexes and her lack of need to show off. The real woman is not a victim of artificial insecurities. All she wants to do is be independent. Driving is an element of independence so you can't be a real woman if you aren't a better driver than all men. The real woman is independent, or her physical strength wouldn't mean that much.
It pains me to admit it, but I have seen evidence of this. True story: A couple of years back, for a friend's birthday bash, I was invited to go indoor go-carting. I'd never done it before and it sounded like great fun. There was a group of 8 of us, 5 guys and 3 girls including the one who's birthday it was. None of the girls had ever go-carted before and one of them didn't even own a car. Anyway we had 2 sessions on the track, like a qualifying round and then a race proper. It was great fun but the results were somewhat shocking, to me at least. In first place was a guy, but he was experience in motor sport and had been go-carting many times, so that was to be expected, however in 2nd and 3rd places were girls! And the 3rd girl (the one who didn't even own a car) came in 5th! I placed 4th and I cannot tell you how hard I tried to overtake the girl in front of me, but it was just damed impossible! Every time I gained on her enough to even think about overtaking, she just pulled away again. I kept thinking she will mess up sooner or later and I will get my chance, but she never did. She cornered perfectly and accelerated perfectly every time and there was nothing I could do, she was bossing me! I put a brave face on it but I was furious and felt really humiliated as did the other guys, one of whom could barely disguise his disgust. I think before all of us guys just assumed the girls would be in the last 3 places. How very wrong we were. Matt
Women understand and feel things much more deeply than us men. How you feel the vehicle is key to good driving, so perfect driving technique is to be expected by women who don't buy into the "female inability" myth. I understand this because my mother drives better than my father, albeit she doesn't have his amount of experience. Plus it isn't just my mother. All the best drivers I know are women, they all achieve a smoothness I would otherwise only expect from a professional chauffeur. Most importantly, they all do this with manual gearboxes, as specified by the first anonymous comment of this thread. Gears kick a lot when men attempt to drive manual. Perhaps it should be named womanual. Babis
@ Matt. Ha ha ha! Poor little boys were taught a lesson they'll never forget. The girls proved they have superior driving skills, even the one who had no driving experience still beat most of the boys! That's how much better we are than you. And make no mistake, if they can beat you at driving, then they can beat you at pretty much everything else too. This illustrates perfectly the turning tide. Sorry boys, you are just gonna have to get used to it ha ha ha! Tasha
Perhaps Tasha has heard a lot of bad things about her own driving. We all hear a lot of bad things about women's driving in general. This to me is enough justification for her reaction. It hurts to admit, but it is us men who are the real bitches. Babis
Interesting article at NRAfamily.org entitled "Are Women Better Shooters than Men?" The author is an Army Colonel who trained officers and others authorized to carry a pistols. Here are a few quote:
1. Every woman I ever trained on the Army .45 fired Expert on the first day of training. 2. My wife and both my daughters can outshoot me.
Also: " All the women fired Expert their first day, but less than a third of the men did so."
His theory is that women are more "coachable". I think it is physical due to women's greater stability due to a lower center of gravity.
The New Amazon Nation is in the process of forming.
Better physical stability due to lower center of gravity, better aim due to better nervous system, better muscle control, better reflexes ... the list goes on.
I wanna say The ideal of "real women" some commenters on this blog have been championing sure is a convenient one for their cause. That way they get to pick and choose, propping up strong women as examples of female physical superiority while dismissing those that contradict such a worldview.
"Those that contradict such a worldview" are lazy or afraid, not unable to develop themselves into real women. That is a very good reason for us to "dismiss" them within the frame of discussing about real women. For them to not be dismissed, they will have to work.
One thing not talked about enough? female sexual supremacy. female can enjoy much stronger orgasm, multiple orgasm, higher sexual stamina. a female can take on many men a day while every men have to rest after each ejaculation. Its not even fair
It's like women are operating with a higher level of power all around. Women have a built in power generator, and males are running on weak batteries. The relative weakness of male sexual longevity and durability is simply another expression of the overall inferiority of the male body. Men pride themselves on their 'explosive' power, but I would say women have males beat there too.
What do you think about women who workout extensivily? My ex-wife and her friend were teens when they started going to the gym and worked out practically every day for years. They both look amazing, not like a bodybuilder but their muscles are visible. They get both positive and negative feedback both from men and women although it was worse when they just started working out. Apparently society is slowly accepting the fact that it is ok for women to be physically strong too. Although the last post published here shows that that is not true for everywhere in the world. Apparently a school teacher thought it necessary to protect boys from seeing a woman workout. I think women are already very strong mentally and I don't mind if they will become very strong physically too. But do you think there will be a time where women don't have to endure a lot of negativity?
One key difference between the genders is that the woman can work out much more extensively. There might be a time in the future when the more capable gender will not have to deal with male denial, but the future is not reliably predictable.
There's no doubt that attitudes are changing. Remember that women were once prohibited from running in marathons. We all know what has happened since then, as women prove their superior endurance and win ultramarathons by wide margins over males and dominate long distance swimming records. Female power is growing stronger all the time. But there is a backlash movement trying to salvage male egos. The backlash will fail.
We are still "prohibited" from a lot of things, but the real woman does not obey arbitrary male decisions. She always and only does either what she wants or what she sees necessary. Men can talk about it all they want, but the best they can hope for is that we find no reason to punish them. However, both genders need to remember punishment is a reaction, not a proaction. Punishment is relevant to something that has already happened, is already happening or is already preset to happen. "Reacting" upon arbitrary predictions is simply the male version of proaction - I say this because most men regularly fall in this error and need punishment. The real woman gives the man what he needs, not what he wants.
I think we should emphasize the importance of education in the early ages. Young girls should be educated from the very start not to hold back and to make the most of their endless potential, because we will never know just how extremely amazing and superior females are until we have a whole generation of girls consistently encouraged to be themselves from birth. I think some form of positive discrimination is necessary to accelerate the change.
As girls see more and more examples of themselves and other girls destroying boys it will make them more and more condifent and it will also teach boys to respect girls as their superiors.
Right. Those of us with pre-teen girls should enroll them in gymnastics, martial arts, and weight training. When they become teenagers, then a week long course in firearms training.
Exactly that is the point of training them to be as strong as possible. Untrained women tend to live their life how patrinazi men want. I will admit however that I disagree on firearm training, under normal circumstances - note that the "freedom to carry a gun" is not a normal circumstance.
Please do not ever use the term patrinazi again. Calling anything you don't like Nazism makes you look quite ridiculous. And don't point out to me some people use the term feminazi on the internet, two wrongs don't make a right.
You have committed three very distinct patrinazi fouls: 1)Supporting an attack on our right to free choice of outfit 2)Trying to dictate even our thoughts 3)Indirectly attacking our right to physical training Not only can I use the term patrinazi, I can also define that it is your nickname.
You don't represent everyone I disagree with. Point 1 has to do with your posts on the "Can you freaking believe this in 2020?" thread. It is ridiculous to suggest that we should give the benefit of doubt to the patrinazis that attacked her right to free choice of outfit. Point 3 is about your suggestion to "let girls live their lives how they want", as if training were oppression. It is obvious that you are the same person. Your communicational maneuvres also give away that you are afraid of an actual debate against us here, as I realised from your claim that I "missed the point". Fact is, you 've made absolutely no point. I advise you to get real, or you will very soon be getting lost.
I am sorry ma'am, I was acting out of place, I will refrain from voicing my thoughts made by an inferior male brain. It is not the place of a lowly man like me to question my female superiors. Pray forgive this fool.
The problem is, you weren't "voicing thoughts". You just want to impose dress code uniformity. Seeing as this is a standard in dictatorships such as Hitler's and Metaxas', the reason of your behaviour can't be very different to theirs. It is that the sight of prominent musculature (anyhow you may define it) observably affects people's feelings and behaviour, be that in a positive way in certain cases or negative in others. Thanks to your "voicing", we all know which your case is...
Nice to see a lively debate on here. @ femalesaresuperior - Excellent point! Education is the key and what the concept of the New Amazon Nation is based on. Indeed a female dominated society is the logical outcome of educating young girls to make the most of their endless potential.
@ Captain Crown: Great points all round! I'd never heard the term "Patrinazi" before, but it makes a kind of sense. you are quite right not to allow anyone to tell you which words you can and cannot use. In the current political climate there is a tendency from those on the left to accuse anyone that disagrees with them of literally being a Nazi - which is of course ridiculous and childish - however it does not apply in this case as its use here is clearly euphemistic and dare I say a little tongue in cheek to illustrate the unreasonable and oppressive nature of some Patriarchal attitudes.
@qx500: Totally agree that young girls should be encouraged to take up gymnastics, martial arts etc and even firearms training, anything that encourages girls to develop their physical attributes and view themselves as physical entities, not to be messed with...
Judge more carefully the history of national socialism. Any ideology that gives a dictator excuses for disputing people's rights is practically dictatorship. Proper leadership is built on mutual respect of rights. Position abuse is not leadership. Considering this, I had to be literal in calling him a nazi. He disputed both genders'(!) right to free choice of outfit. Also, don't accuse exclusively the left for mistakes of both sides. The feminazi term was first (ab)used by a political friend of Trump's. Just as patrinazi is someone who disputes women's rights, feminazi is someone who disputes men's rights. Defending one's rights is not the same as disputing the rights of some other side. Legitimate rights aren't the same thing as privileges. The former are actually attacked by the latter.
Errr...I don't need any lectures about the history of national socialism thank you, as it is something I have studied in depth. I've just defended you right to use the term "nazi" in a euphemistic sense, but if you meant it literally, then you were being ridiculous and childish. I'm afraid it is a fact that the term "nazi" is commonly used as a slur by people on the political left towards people who disagree with them, not the other way around.
Now, your input has hither-to been interesting, but if you think you can come onto my blog and disrespectfully tell me what to say and think, then you are very much mistaken..
This CaptainCrown person is some wannabe badass who constantly flips out at people over the smallest things and then lectures people like she's smarter than everyone when there's a clear discrepancy between how she rates her intelligence and how it actually is. I may be speaking only for myself, but I don't care much for her on here.
Indeed, it is irritating when you agree with someone and support them, but instead of acknowledging this, they look for ways to disagree with and lecture you...Very odd.
@ Captain Crown. Of course I did, because it is irrelevant to this conversation and impossible to prove. It doesn't matter who first used a particular term, what matters is its common use. In any case I've already explained that the terms "Femi-nazi" and "Patri-nazi" are euphemistic and used figuratively, therefore should not be taken too seriously or cause that much offence.
I didn't say you weren't allowed to disagree with me. I said it is irritating when people who you agree with, look for ways to disagree for the sake of it.
Why would you ask such a pointless question of me, if you had read and understood my previous comment?
No, I don't disagree for the sake of it. I have my positions and stand by them. Also, my question about Trump's government is far from pointless. Or did you suddenly forget about the feminazi term and how they and their supporters abuse it?
In that case what were you doing by telling me to "Judge more carefully the history of national socialism." When all I had done was to defend your right to use the term "Patri-nazi"??
Your question about Trump is completely pointless because you were directing it at me and I had already explained to you that even if there was any indisputable proof that someone from The Trump administration was the first to use the term "Femi-nazi" (which there simply cannot be as it would be impossible to prove that no-one on the planet had used it before) Then it still wouldn't make Trump, his administration or anyone on the right responsible for everyone who uses that term. On top of that I have also explained (twice now) that it is euphemistic, therefore not equivalent of calling someone an actual "Nazi".
Now if you are not capable of addressing the points that I am making and instead insist on merely repeating your original point over and over again, then this conversation is over.
This time I took the conversation from the top and saw the comment you now refer to. When I posted the "Since I am not allowed to disagree with you" comment, it was not up. Then I just replied to what I saw without scrolling so how would I see it... Anyway. It truly isn't so important who used the feminazi term first. I ought to have focused on who let it loose on the mainstream media. What a difference that makes since the answer is still Trump's lot, one could ask. That said, you are clearly wrong about the responsibility part, especially considering how heavily brainwashed the average USA citizen apparently is and how old the internet is. Most (if not all) governments abuse money for the sake of staying in power, so you should expect part of this abused money to go into paid trolls that will deliberately abuse some term or play some other trick to pass into society a carefully designed message. Of course I won't claim to have the solid proof with names etc, but I bet you don't have proof against the said statement. If you are a woman, you must know from experience whether to trust a patrinazi. And what with the feminazi term being as you say "euphemistic"? Why it is (ab)used is what matters. Since they use it to discourage us from our rights, we can't just sit and concede it. They call us feminazis, they are patrinazis. If you 're still going to defend Trump, then damn yes this conversation is over.
I did post an almost complete response, which is still not up. If next time I check it does not appear, I will expose the one point I purposedly omitted. This conversation will be over when I say so. Censoring does absolutely no good at this point. Why? Because in your latest post you have made a mistake that explains a lot about you. Care to find it? Or will you also censor yourself?
Sorry to intervene with something only partly relevant to your debate. In Trump's America, men's MLS is being played but the women's season was cancelled due to coronavirus. At the same time, women's divisions in most European countries continue without problems. Dictatorship is the real virus.
@ Captain Crown: Yet you still did not address the example I gave of you disagreeing for the sake of it? I've gone from defending your right to use a word, to somehow "defending Trump", even though I've debunked your assertion that he or anyone in his administration could be responsible for the use of that word, in exactly the same way that I would if you had accused Obama's admin of the same thing. And since you have used an equivalent term, doesn't that make you a hypocrite?
I'm afraid it is incumbent on you to prove the points you are making. Merely saying there is no proof to the contrary really isn't good enough. This blog is not about party politics and it would be far better if you could be more constructive about female empowerment instead of starting petty, irrelevant arguments with people who fundamentally mostly agree with you...
You have not debunked my assertion about the responsibility for the popularity of the feminazi term abuse. You have only denied it. Me using the patrinazi term is not enough to make me a hypocrite. I am just using it as a revenge term against patrinazis, not abusing it like they do with feminazi to any woman who simply defends her rights. Can't tell the difference? Try living in Greece...
All this "petty irrelevant argument" would never happen if you didn't try to impose an illegitimate frame around my right to use the patrinazi term. I have my own frame for how to use it and how not, as it occurs from the first paragraph of this post. And If I 'm being honest, your choice to place that frame of yours as "defending" for my said right doesn't say good things about your own politics.
Oh, so the fact you have no actual proof of your claim, doesn't debunk your assertion? Ok. I have been hearing the term Femi-nazi for years before Trump came to power, in fact you can probably find it being used on this blog way before 2016. It's not a term I've ever taken that seriously. Men are very sensitive to the threat posed by women, perceived or otherwise, so they lash out with the most offensive thing they can think of. We should actually take great satisfaction in the knowledge of how genuinely scared they are whenever we hear this term.
By the same token, I don't mind anyone using the term "Patri-nazi" and once again. I DEFENDED your right to use it, so what's all this nonsense about "illegitimate frames"? You have picked an argument with someone who fundamentally agrees with you..Why not save it for someone who doesn't?
You are forgetting about one feeling: disgust. That is what I feel when someone uses the feminazi term against either me or any other woman who simply defends her rights. Also, that is what I feel about how you communicate the matter of my right to use the patrinazi term. I have explained the frame within which I use the term. I don't need you to define whether I use a term euphemistically or literally. That was your mistake.
One more thing. My "lack of proof" refers to whether there are paid trolls or all this tendency of term abuse is just because of bad education practises all over the planet. The only sure fact on this matter is that most terms are abused one way or another. Regarding which political wing supports sexism there is SOLID PROOF of it being the right. Trump is one example, Greece's "Golden Dawn" literal neonazi formation is another, Erdogan wants Turk women to wear that stupid thing on their heads and generally all the bad countries for a woman to live in are under dictatorship (albeit several of them abuse terms such as "freedom", "security", "democracy" and "communism" to disguise their nazi positions). Or are you going to claim that Trump is a leftist, Mihaloliakos is a leftist, Erdogan is a leftist etc? And before you "debunk" me by mentioning that "Golden Dawn" is not even in the parliament, I assure you on two things. One is, they are very well present in our society. The other is, Mitsotakis is also a dictator. Are you sure you will be able to debunk these?
@ Captain Crown: I've just explained why you shouldn't feel disgust. All you are doing is playing into the hands of the ones hurling that insult. So you feel disgusted that I defended your rights??? Ok, well that would explain your continued rant. I guess there is just no pleasing some people.
In my experience sexism is less common on the right. Right wing conservative parties have produced two female Prime Ministers here in the UK, while left wing parties have produced none. In fact the left wing party here in the UK has never even had a female leader and it just failed again recently in that endeavour, despite having a mostly female short list...
I do not accept your "explanation". Did you, or did you not, try to define that I used the patrinazi term euphemistically? You did and you know it full well. What you don't seem to get is how this constitutes the frame you define as "defence". My disgust is exactly towards the difference between the truth and your definition of it. What is so complicated about this?
Regarding the political matter, I have two questions. 1)What did your two female prime ministers do for our rights? 2)Who participates in party leader selection in the UK?
@ Hellfirequeen....err I mean Captain Crown: Well that is your problem and you will just have to go through life being disgusted and bitter.
No, I just said that I view those terms as euphemistic as they are a play on words and I don't believe most people would be childish enough to mean them literally. So if you did mean the term "Patri-nazi" to be literal, then as I explained before, I think you are being childish and ridiculous as well as ignorant of history.
To answer your questions: The first female PM created a booming, service based economy which gave countless women the opportunity to enter the work place and become financially independent. The second female PM wasn't around long enough to be judged on this matter, but your original point was about the political right wing being sexist - 2 females being voted in as party leaders proves otherwise - so of course you have to change the subject.
Secondly, In both cases, the entire party membership votes for the party. leader
@ Anonymous: Not sure what MLS is, but I know that the extent of covid lockdown restrictions are decided by individual state authorities, so I highly doubt that is a presidential decision.
MLS stands for Major League Soccer. It is a national division, not limited to specific states. The women's top division is also nationwide, so this double standard under the excuse of coronavirus is obviously a presidential decision. It is his revenge against Megan Rapinoe's rightful protesting. Female empowerment has certain political opponents. Trump is one of them. Or did I miss something truly spectacular?
Ok, so it's just a feeling you have...there's no actual proof? Yeah I get the whole "Orange man bad" thing. My view would be that no woman should allow herself to be in a position where her ability to earn a living, or anything else for that matter, can be decided by a man.
I have to respond to this. Anonymous clearly explains that both top divisions are nationwide, not limited to specific states. I assume you can look that up before you rush to call on "feelings". Men play like before covid, but women's season has been rendered void "because of covid". Does that not smell excuse to you? Here we have a saying: now that we found a priest, let's bury 5-6. (Hint: covid is the "priest" here.) I agree with your position, but it isn't like many countries have enough female voice in their political structures, is it? The solution is to only vote for women, specifically those who provenly fight for our rights. Just moaning a position does not solve a problem. Working for the solution does.
The proof is right in front of you. The top divisions for both genders are not limited to specific states. Besides this, the matter is not so much about money as it is about our right to be in proper physical condition. What is your blog about if it isn't about our physical empowerment?
@ Anonymous: Whilst it does seem grossly unfair that the men's season is continuing, but the women's isn't, I still find it hard to believe that this is due to an intervention by the POTUS and would need some kind of evidence before I join in the condemnation. The circumstances on their own don't constitute proof.
Of course the blog is about female physical empowerment, but let's identify correctly where the challenges to this lie. If we don't bother to do that, then we are just wasting our time...
You do have a point about official proof here, but to get that you would need the relevant official documents from the USA government, wouldn't you? Or do you think the mainstream media would let people know of something so revealing of the covid fraud when they are still trying to terrorise us with it? The best proof we can have here is the combination of facts. There are five key facts this circumstance consists of:
1)USA women's season void while MLS goes on 2)USA women's season void while most other countries did not cancel their women's seasons 3)USA women's season void just after Trump's disrespectful behaviour towards Megan Rapinoe during the 2019 World Cup 4)USA women's season void "because of coronavirus" 5)Trump accuses Obama for funding the lab that created the virus, when in fact Obama passed a law Dr Fauci broke. Now, instead of being imprisoned, Fauci is the USA's Tsiodras. The mainstream media cover him, but that doesn't make him anyhow innocent. The mainstream media themselves are not innocent.
Clearly this is a political decision of Trump's, or at least a decision he had some major part in. He is not the only one to pose a challenge to female empowerment, but that does not mean he doesn't pose such a challenge at all. Guilty. Case closed.
Right, so you have zero evidence of Trump's involvement in this decision - just wild conjecture? Just saying something over and over doesn't make it so. I would defend anyone who is being falsely accused of doing something with zero evidence.
All men are a challenge to us in one form or another. I just don't see how Donald Trump is any worse than anyone else. I've certainly yet to hear any actual evidence that he is. I wouldn't normally indulge a conversation about politics on this blog as it can be very devise, however as this is an open thread, I guess it doesn't hurt.
For me, being an Amazon is about seeking the truth, not just following the crowd. If you want to believe that someone is bad, just because one group of people tell you they are - that's up to you, but it usually won't lead you to the truth...
Most males are in denial about being the weaker sex. And it's not just about muscular strength, but mental, emotional, and physiological strength that women are superior to males.
Female supremacy isn't just about 'reversing' patriarchal roles. Female led society will be based on ways of doing things that will completely change the roles of the sexes in ways we can't really know until it happens. But if you really look at what happens in most circumstances where women become dominant in previously male-controlled settings, the whole game changes. Since women are better than men at just about any task you can name, reversing the roles is a recipe for failure. Males cannot replace women in the old female roles because frankly, men wouldn't be up to the task. Whatever role males end up with in a Female run world will be decided by women, but I wouldn't expect men to find themselves 'replacing' women in anything.
Well said yboy. As long as I lived alone, I couldn't get the quality of life I was getting before thanks to my mother and her super intelligence. Thankfully I got lucky and fell in love with a massive muscular woman, who all of a sudden set things straight again with her decisions. Babis
More interaction is the short answer. Until more women who look at this blog step forward from the shadows and ask the questions, give their opinions, engage in conversation, meet like minds etc. I'm afraid it is pretty uninspiring for me to add much to the blog...
Don't know if this has been already psoted, but it's a very interesting article on why women are better ultra-endurance athletes than men:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-49284389
these are the main takeaways.
Fiona Kolbinger finised 10 HOURS ahead of her closest male cometitor even though it was her FIRST uktra-cycling event.
She was hoping for women's podium at best but she was surprised at how superior she was to the men
Jamsin Parks beat her best male competitor by 12 HOURS even though SHE HAD TO STOP ALL THE TIME TO BREAST MILK.
Katie Wright beat 40 men and six other women to win the Riverhead Backyard ReLaps Ultra-marathon in New Zealand. That means she was on the top 14.3 percentile of women and the TOP 2.4 PERCENTILE OF THE MEN.
Women have more endurance. Their superior muscle fibers make them more resistance to fatigue.
Women have better oxygen efficiency
Women are mentally tougher
Women are more intelligent. Many men zoom off quickly guided by their little pricks and end they soon slow down, suffer hypothermia and freeze their little pricks.
Women cope better with emotions, while men crumble under fatigue, sleep deprivation and confusion.
Child birth helps make women tougher than men
Ann Trason was breaking records and beating men in ultra-endurance marathons in the late 1980s until 2004. She held the title of ultra-runner of the year for more than a decade and broke 20 world records in distances ranging from 40 to 100 miles.
There used to be hardly any women in ultra.endurance. Now, even though they're still a small minority, they're still beating men left and right.
Thanks for sharing that article! I've never read it before. And that's exactly what I'm looking for! It shows with no doubt how women beat men in ultra-endurance. That's such a proof of female supremacy!
@femalesaresuperior , Thanks for that nice list of Female advantages over the inferior sex. The list just gets longer every day! I especially like to see the ultra events where the Female advantage just gets bigger the longer and tougher the race goes on.
That is a really interesting article and one that conferms what many of us suspected. I don't have any experience with ultra distance events, but in the context of a much shorter timeframe, I do have a fare amount of experience now rolling and competing with women in Jiu Jitsu. It is pretty much understood that if you have any chance of winning you have to go all out in the begining and hope you get the result you want. The longer the match the stronger the female gets and the weaker the male gets. There is nothing worse than that feeling.
@Brad "The longer the match the stronger the female gets and the weaker the male gets." You said there is "nothing worse than that feeling" but that's only the male perspective. Wouldn't you agree it must be a really good feeling from the perspective of the stronger sex?
Well yes that would be the other side of the coin. Of course the the feeling of your strength deteriorating as your opponent only grows stronger as they sense victory sucks no matter what the gender of your adversary, but I have found that females seem to have this killer instinct that really comes out when they sense their opponent is in trouble. Maybe I am imagining that but I don't thinks so. While I have to endure it from time to time on the mat, it seems to be playing it self out on a much broader scale in societal trends as well.
@Brad No, you're not imagining that. When I wrestle my boyfriend, I can figure out easily when the fight has left out of him. Till that moment, I'm largely defensive, letting him under the illusion that his strong muscles can subdue me. But later, becoming the aggressor, he submits within minutes.
What happens on the mat is a manifestation of the societal trends. Seeing the power slipping away from their hands, most men fight back and find themselves on the losing end. Not saying that even if some of them submit, they don't have to endure beating from the superior gender...
Thanks Xaan! Recently discovered this blog and couldn't seem to relate more with the topics and comments here... I hope both women and men lose their confusion as to who is the superior gender and accept the truth!
@ WomenRule. I got into wrestling at an early age purely because I wanted to fight boys. I don't know why, but it has always been a powerful instinct in me and there is nothing on this earth that I love more than beating them. and I have never lost a fight with a boy or man on or off the mat. Men don't seem capable of playing the long game in a fight and you're right, there is a definite point where you know they are spent, usually by about the 01:30 mark. Then you can flick the aggression switch, go full bitch queen on him and finish it real quick! I just wish more girls had the confidence to try it, we really could have an Amazon nation. Thank you Xaan for this site, I love it! Staci x
Staci: Women have more stamina than we have. As a wrestler, I know that if the fight is during too long, I will lose for sure. I'm exhausted faster than the women. 1: 30 is already quite long for a man who fights full force. For me I would say the mark is about 1 or 1:15. So, I try to pin quickly. But, I've also be pinned by some women within one minute.
If you watch any mixed match on YouTube the pattern is usually the same. The boy starts flailing his arms and legs until he soon gets winded and ends up lying immobile and exhausted in the girl's clutches. The girls play with the boys like a spider playing with a fly.
@femalesaresuperior Hopefully, it's not always the same. There are examples on YT where the boys win too. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxxCnTRJjdk See that collection of pins!
Hi im new here. Female aged 20, love this kind of stuff. I do a lot of training myself. Love watching men get beat, huge turn on for me. Im sure more women feel the same, just society is still backward about it.
Well, I try...can never seen to devote that much time to it these days. I moderate the comments and encourage debate, but don't allow abuse or trolling..
Very exciting blog... Till now I thought I was among the very few who got beaten up and humiliated by a girl, but this blog shows that isn't quite rare, in fact a sign of things to come. Keep the good content coming!
#iamshatterproof tough girls beat boys and men https://www.thequint.com/voices/women/iamshatterproof-tough-girls-beat-boys-says-divya-sain 🤼♀️👊🏽💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽🤘🏽💄👊🏽❤️❤️❤️ Polegirl 💋
Polegirl: Thanks for that link! That girl is very skilled and impressive. She rules, beating men in a very macho context. She's a very good examples for everybody!
Since no one is posting recently, I'd thought I'd post something to keep this thread alive.
Here is an article from last year. If anybody here is from Glascow, and has some news about this, please tell us about it. Here are the first few paragraphs and a link to the full article below.
Women should be allowed to fight men in karate competitions, according to instructor Ben Fail.
He says that although men and women spar together, it is unusual to see them take each other on in competition.
"Karate is about control and technique so, for me, gender doesn't even come in to it," Ben says.
Five years ago, he held a mixed-gender competition for under 16s at his Glasgow club, which invited other clubs to join in.
Ben says the idea was not fully welcomed by other coaches because they were unsure of breaking the tradition of gender segregation within competitions - even though opposite genders fight each other in training classes in other clubs too.
Interesting article - Thanks for posting. Of course we know the real reason for the reticence around mixed competition. Traditional thinking is that men are the best fighters. Mixed competitions would expose this as being completely untrue and provide the perfect motivation for females to excel in the sport, to the point they become dominant.
Females becoming dominant is exactly the greatest fear in the male psyche. One of the most powerful instincts that males have is to compensate for their inferiority to women. Males instinctively know that females are superior but are also naturally troubled by this reality and so they work to suppress it.
The creation of male-only physical competition is one of the most carefully guarded of all patriarchal bastions since the most obvious area of natural male inferiority is physical. Male envy of female physiological power drives men to belittle and demean what they themselves do not possess and to keep women under male control.
These days, patriarchy is falling apart of its own built in flaws. It couldn't last forever. Female physical power is no secret, and it's just a matter of time before female superiority and dominance in every area of society is fully established.
Some males welcome the defeat of patriarchy and cheer the rise of the powerful female. That number will certainly grow. After all, if we can all appreciate the highest levels of human potential, we can recognize that it is women who are that potential's embodiment.
A number of years ago I took Karate for about two months and then had to stop as my schedule wouldn't permit it. The Head sensi was a women who was one of the most terifying fighters I have every seen. During my short time there I never got to witness this, but there were many strories of how, owver the years diffent guys would get cocky and try to chanllenge her. Word was she always made sure to put them in their place in a way that left no doubt in anyones mind who the top dog was. Watching her, I couldn't imgagine anyone beign stupid enough to take her on, but I guees there are alway going to be men that are threatened by females like her. I have no other Karate dojo to compare it to, but in her dojo there were several women who were superior to almost all ( if not all) the men.
oh my god please no! I enjoy watching women triumph over men but to legitimize it on such a mass scale would destroy many young men! The display of female supremacy would tip the balance of power to women's favour. I prefer mixed fights to stay underground.
@gnome mage, I hope you're not serious that legitimizing female triumph over males would 'destroy many young men'.
The healthiest thing for males would be to learn that their claims to superiority and even their claims to equality with women are incorrect. Reenforcing the myth of female weakness and protecting the fragile male ego is exactly what's wrong with patriarchy.
Boys can learn that male strength can be expressed by being strong enough to accept their inferiority to women.
I am a female supremacist and i embrace female supremacy as a way of life. But my journey has not been easy, i was beaten by girls in boxing in front of my own girlfriend and she cheered for my female opponent instead of me. When my girlfriend saw how weak men are she decided to wear the pants in the relationship. it took me a while but now i have totally accepted the power dynamics in our relationship. My girlfriend has been kind to me i know there are women that are less so.
I'd imagine the same process is not going to be as smooth for every boys and it might be bumpy to unplug everyone too quickly from the matrix...
just talked to a gym trainer today and he rubbished the idea women cant have high upper body strength. He said women can be stronger than men pound for pound. He had seen some pretty petit girl doing 14 pull ups while bigger guys cant do 3.
Wow! I always upper body strength is the only place men can compare well and looks like i am wrong on this one!
People mistake muscle size for strength. Males have bigger muscles on average because they are bigger on average. As you probably know, scientific research and testing has demonstrated that when examined on the basis of pure, lean muscle fibre, there is no real difference between the strength of male and female muscle when they are the same size and weight. But the difference comes when those muscles are put to the test. Male muscles may be equal to female muscles under the microscope when they are inert, but under stress, working hard, female muscles outperform male muscles by enormous margins, often twice the endurance and resistance to fatigue. The reasons for this are not agreed upon, but the evidence suggests that there are at least several factors. The female nervous system is better at transmitting more signals to women's muscles and activating more of the muscle and the female circulatory system is better at ensuring blood flow to the muscles to prevent buildup of harmful acids which cause fatigue. Add to that the fact that estrogen is better at protecting muscle fibres and keeping them flexible while testosterone actually damages muscles even though it also is a factor in making male muscles grow bigger. The paradox of male muscles is that the very thing that makes them big and 'appear' to be stronger is also the thing that makes them less efficient and less resilient.
So strength cannot be measured merely based on the inert structure of muscle tissue, but on effort over time. An initial burst of strength means very little if a male is worn out soon after while a female maintains her strength far longer.
Many people don't even consider size, they expect the man to be stronger just because he is the man. Dumb but true. The real woman is stronger per size, bigger, more resistant to fatigue and still more explosive, more agile than men. Her athletic ability is way beyond men's ultimate limits.
I can confirm that. I've seen guys who apparently looked strong miserably failing to complete one pitiful pull up, while apparently dainty girls do many of them with ease.
@Anonymous, Good point. People 'expect' the man to be stronger even if he's smaller. For some reason it's often assumed that even an athletic woman must be weaker than an untrained male. Female potential is indeed beyond the limits of the male. This is what males have always been afraid of and women in the past have simply allowed male fear of female superiority to impose limits on the superior sex. But this is changing fast.
@yboy Speaking of muscles, the other day I saw a couple out jogging and the guy suddenly stopped because he was having a contracture. His girlfriend waited impatiently as he tried to stretch the contracture away. When they finally got going he stopped again after a few steps looking like he was in pain. He told her to keep going and she ran away lightly and effortlessly as he walked behind her, looking defeated and humilliated.
@femalesaresuperior, Certainly the fate of the male sex will be decided by women. The rise of female power has already gone beyond the point of no return. The exact turning point is not clear, maybe it was when Nettie Stevens discovered the difference between the male Xy chromosome structure and the female XX structure that patriarchy was given its death sentence. After all, it's hard to convince women that they are inferior to males when science has just proved the opposite.
@femalesaresuperior, i read a book about amazon utopia legends a long time ago. Allow me to share this. It speaks of a queen who revolt against her queen and founded her own amazon queendom with her court servants. In this queendom, men have little to no rights. men cannot practice martial arts or strength training, only women do. and men cannot turn down a women's marriage proposal. men stay at home and do all the house work and are obligated by law to provide his wife sexual satisfaction, or maybe punished by castration. Quite a scary place to live in as a men if you think so.
Gnomemage you’re right of course that amazon utopia sounds very scary for men, but if you think about it our whole civilisation has been built around the opposite, with up until recently women having little or no rights and only now are exploring their physical potential and discovering that actually we are a lot weaker than them, I guess our fate could be how much mercy we receive when the balance of power shifts. Of course some men will resist like in the premise/prediction of the Gunrunners story, but they are doomed to be beaten. Happily I will surrender, I think it is natural for men to do so (as it is for women to dominate) and it would be liberating for men I think. I just hope we still have some rights and are forgiven for how men treated the mistress gender in the past
Hi everyone. Apparently Xaan can't access the blog for the time being due to technical problems and told me to let you know. I'll tell if I have any news.
Real women's driving skills. The world needs to forget about that stupid male opinion that goes "women can't drive". We are better drivers than them, so much that the comparison is practically just a favour to true science. Actually, if you can't drive you're not a real woman. Maybe men are promoting autonomous vehicles just so we won't be able to prove them wrong behind the steering wheel. We must not allow that fashion to grow. Real women buy cars with all of the following features:
ReplyDeleteManual transmission. This does NOT include "sequential" gearboxes with "manual" mode. The real woman doesn't need robots for shifting.
No "stability programmes" or "antispins". The real woman is more than capable of efficient accelerator modulation and does not need electronics to do that.
No "power steering". The real woman will still be able to turn the steering wheel with her little finger. My car is a Lada 2105. Drive one if you ever have the chance. I love its genuine feel.
Low overall height. The real woman doesn't need to follow the SUV trend. A car with good mechanical handling is essential for an enjoyable yet safe drive on a tight, technical b-road, or on track.
Proper engine sound. There is no joy in driving without the right mechanical soundtrack. Don't get fooled by the electric car fashion. I believe the future is biofuel as it keeps the sound and increases output potential. Yes, it is also good for reducing pollution, but petrol cars are already not the heaviest polluter. I suspect that must be weapon industry, make-up industry, or maybe smoke industry. The real woman does care what a nature she will hand to the next real women, but doesn't fall for marketing tricks.
But most importantly, the real woman goes for test drives before she decides which car to buy. The real woman knows how to get a feel for what she's driving and its mechanical quality. Drive a variety of different brands and models on a tight b-road and you'll see. Just don't be an obstacle to other drivers. The real woman can go faster than men without causing the serious accidents men tend to cause. The two main reasons are her better reflexes and her lack of need to show off. The real woman is not a victim of artificial insecurities. All she wants to do is be independent. Driving is an element of independence so you can't be a real woman if you aren't a better driver than all men. The real woman is independent, or her physical strength wouldn't mean that much.
The male vs female insurance rates are a testimony to this.
DeleteIt pains me to admit it, but I have seen evidence of this. True story: A couple of years back, for a friend's birthday bash, I was invited to go indoor go-carting. I'd never done it before and it sounded like great fun. There was a group of 8 of us, 5 guys and 3 girls including the one who's birthday it was. None of the girls had ever go-carted before and one of them didn't even own a car. Anyway we had 2 sessions on the track, like a qualifying round and then a race proper. It was great fun but the results were somewhat shocking, to me at least. In first place was a guy, but he was experience in motor sport and had been go-carting many times, so that was to be expected, however in 2nd and 3rd places were girls! And the 3rd girl (the one who didn't even own a car) came in 5th! I placed 4th and I cannot tell you how hard I tried to overtake the girl in front of me, but it was just damed impossible! Every time I gained on her enough to even think about overtaking, she just pulled away again. I kept thinking she will mess up sooner or later and I will get my chance, but she never did. She cornered perfectly and accelerated perfectly every time and there was nothing I could do, she was bossing me! I put a brave face on it but I was furious and felt really humiliated as did the other guys, one of whom could barely disguise his disgust. I think before all of us guys just assumed the girls would be in the last 3 places. How very wrong we were. Matt
DeleteWomen understand and feel things much more deeply than us men. How you feel the vehicle is key to good driving, so perfect driving technique is to be expected by women who don't buy into the "female inability" myth. I understand this because my mother drives better than my father, albeit she doesn't have his amount of experience. Plus it isn't just my mother. All the best drivers I know are women, they all achieve a smoothness I would otherwise only expect from a professional chauffeur. Most importantly, they all do this with manual gearboxes, as specified by the first anonymous comment of this thread. Gears kick a lot when men attempt to drive manual. Perhaps it should be named womanual. Babis
Delete@ Matt. Ha ha ha! Poor little boys were taught a lesson they'll never forget. The girls proved they have superior driving skills, even the one who had no driving experience still beat most of the boys! That's how much better we are than you. And make no mistake, if they can beat you at driving, then they can beat you at pretty much everything else too. This illustrates perfectly the turning tide. Sorry boys, you are just gonna have to get used to it ha ha ha! Tasha
DeletePerhaps Tasha has heard a lot of bad things about her own driving. We all hear a lot of bad things about women's driving in general. This to me is enough justification for her reaction. It hurts to admit, but it is us men who are the real bitches. Babis
DeleteInteresting article at NRAfamily.org entitled "Are Women Better Shooters than Men?" The author is an Army Colonel who trained officers and others authorized to carry a pistols. Here are a few quote:
ReplyDelete1. Every woman I ever trained on the Army .45 fired Expert on the first day of training.
2. My wife and both my daughters can outshoot me.
Also: " All the women fired Expert their first day, but less than a third of the men did so."
His theory is that women are more "coachable". I think it is physical due to women's greater stability due to a lower center of gravity.
The New Amazon Nation is in the process of forming.
I forgot to include the link to the article.
Deletehttps://www.nrafamily.org/articles/2019/1/15/are-women-better-shooters-than-men/
Better physical stability due to lower center of gravity, better aim due to better nervous system, better muscle control, better reflexes ... the list goes on.
DeleteI wanna say
ReplyDeleteThe ideal of "real women" some commenters on this blog have been championing sure is a convenient one for their cause. That way they get to pick and choose, propping up strong women as examples of female physical superiority while dismissing those that contradict such a worldview.
"Those that contradict such a worldview" are lazy or afraid, not unable to develop themselves into real women. That is a very good reason for us to "dismiss" them within the frame of discussing about real women. For them to not be dismissed, they will have to work.
DeleteOne thing not talked about enough? female sexual supremacy. female can enjoy much stronger orgasm, multiple orgasm, higher sexual stamina.
ReplyDeletea female can take on many men a day while every men have to rest after each ejaculation. Its not even fair
It's like women are operating with a higher level of power all around. Women have a built in power generator, and males are running on weak batteries. The relative weakness of male sexual longevity and durability is simply another expression of the overall inferiority of the male body. Men pride themselves on their 'explosive' power, but I would say women have males beat there too.
DeleteWhat do you think about women who workout extensivily? My ex-wife and her friend were teens when they started going to the gym and worked out practically every day for years. They both look amazing, not like a bodybuilder but their muscles are visible. They get both positive and negative feedback both from men and women although it was worse when they just started working out. Apparently society is slowly accepting the fact that it is ok for women to be physically strong too. Although the last post published here shows that that is not true for everywhere in the world. Apparently a school teacher thought it necessary to protect boys from seeing a woman workout. I think women are already very strong mentally and I don't mind if they will become very strong physically too. But do you think there will be a time where women don't have to endure a lot of negativity?
ReplyDeleteOne key difference between the genders is that the woman can work out much more extensively. There might be a time in the future when the more capable gender will not have to deal with male denial, but the future is not reliably predictable.
DeleteThere's no doubt that attitudes are changing. Remember that women were once prohibited from running in marathons. We all know what has happened since then, as women prove their superior endurance and win ultramarathons by wide margins over males and dominate long distance swimming records. Female power is growing stronger all the time. But there is a backlash movement trying to salvage male egos. The backlash will fail.
DeleteWe are still "prohibited" from a lot of things, but the real woman does not obey arbitrary male decisions. She always and only does either what she wants or what she sees necessary. Men can talk about it all they want, but the best they can hope for is that we find no reason to punish them. However, both genders need to remember punishment is a reaction, not a proaction. Punishment is relevant to something that has already happened, is already happening or is already preset to happen. "Reacting" upon arbitrary predictions is simply the male version of proaction - I say this because most men regularly fall in this error and need punishment. The real woman gives the man what he needs, not what he wants.
DeleteI think we should emphasize the importance of education in the early ages. Young girls should be educated from the very start not to hold back and to make the most of their endless potential, because we will never know just how extremely amazing and superior females are until we have a whole generation of girls consistently encouraged to be themselves from birth. I think some form of positive discrimination is necessary to accelerate the change.
ReplyDeleteAs girls see more and more examples of themselves and other girls destroying boys it will make them more and more condifent and it will also teach boys to respect girls as their superiors.
Right. Those of us with pre-teen girls should enroll them in gymnastics, martial arts, and weight training. When they become teenagers, then a week long course in firearms training.
DeleteOr you know, let them live their life how they want?
DeleteExactly that is the point of training them to be as strong as possible. Untrained women tend to live their life how patrinazi men want. I will admit however that I disagree on firearm training, under normal circumstances - note that the "freedom to carry a gun" is not a normal circumstance.
DeletePlease do not ever use the term patrinazi again. Calling anything you don't like Nazism makes you look quite ridiculous. And don't point out to me some people use the term feminazi on the internet, two wrongs don't make a right.
DeleteYou have committed three very distinct patrinazi fouls:
Delete1)Supporting an attack on our right to free choice of outfit
2)Trying to dictate even our thoughts
3)Indirectly attacking our right to physical training
Not only can I use the term patrinazi, I can also define that it is your nickname.
Then live your life calling everyone you disagree with a nazi, see how far how seriously people will take you.
DeleteAlso what the heck are points 1 and 3 even about? Do you confuse me for someone else?
You don't represent everyone I disagree with. Point 1 has to do with your posts on the "Can you freaking believe this in 2020?" thread. It is ridiculous to suggest that we should give the benefit of doubt to the patrinazis that attacked her right to free choice of outfit. Point 3 is about your suggestion to "let girls live their lives how they want", as if training were oppression. It is obvious that you are the same person. Your communicational maneuvres also give away that you are afraid of an actual debate against us here, as I realised from your claim that I "missed the point". Fact is, you 've made absolutely no point. I advise you to get real, or you will very soon be getting lost.
DeleteI am sorry ma'am, I was acting out of place, I will refrain from voicing my thoughts made by an inferior male brain. It is not the place of a lowly man like me to question my female superiors. Pray forgive this fool.
DeleteThe problem is, you weren't "voicing thoughts". You just want to impose dress code uniformity. Seeing as this is a standard in dictatorships such as Hitler's and Metaxas', the reason of your behaviour can't be very different to theirs. It is that the sight of prominent musculature (anyhow you may define it) observably affects people's feelings and behaviour, be that in a positive way in certain cases or negative in others. Thanks to your "voicing", we all know which your case is...
DeleteNice to see a lively debate on here. @ femalesaresuperior - Excellent point! Education is the key and what the concept of the New Amazon Nation is based on. Indeed a female dominated society is the logical outcome of educating young girls to make the most of their endless potential.
Delete@ Captain Crown: Great points all round! I'd never heard the term "Patrinazi" before, but it makes a kind of sense. you are quite right not to allow anyone to tell you which words you can and cannot use. In the current political climate there is a tendency from those on the left to accuse anyone that disagrees with them of literally being a Nazi - which is of course ridiculous and childish - however it does not apply in this case as its use here is clearly euphemistic and dare I say a little tongue in cheek to illustrate the unreasonable and oppressive nature of some Patriarchal attitudes.
@qx500: Totally agree that young girls should be encouraged to take up gymnastics, martial arts etc and even firearms training, anything that encourages girls to develop their physical attributes and view themselves as physical entities, not to be messed with...
Judge more carefully the history of national socialism. Any ideology that gives a dictator excuses for disputing people's rights is practically dictatorship. Proper leadership is built on mutual respect of rights. Position abuse is not leadership. Considering this, I had to be literal in calling him a nazi. He disputed both genders'(!) right to free choice of outfit. Also, don't accuse exclusively the left for mistakes of both sides. The feminazi term was first (ab)used by a political friend of Trump's. Just as patrinazi is someone who disputes women's rights, feminazi is someone who disputes men's rights. Defending one's rights is not the same as disputing the rights of some other side. Legitimate rights aren't the same thing as privileges. The former are actually attacked by the latter.
DeleteThank you, Xaan. I think videos like this should be compulsory viewing for both little girls and little boys:
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1BpdsA5wcI
Errr...I don't need any lectures about the history of national socialism thank you, as it is something I have studied in depth. I've just defended you right to use the term "nazi" in a euphemistic sense, but if you meant it literally, then you were being ridiculous and childish. I'm afraid it is a fact that the term "nazi" is commonly used as a slur by people on the political left towards people who disagree with them, not the other way around.
ReplyDeleteNow, your input has hither-to been interesting, but if you think you can come onto my blog and disrespectfully tell me what to say and think, then you are very much mistaken..
This CaptainCrown person is some wannabe badass who constantly flips out at people over the smallest things and then lectures people like she's smarter than everyone when there's a clear discrepancy between how she rates her intelligence and how it actually is.
DeleteI may be speaking only for myself, but I don't care much for her on here.
@Xaan: You completely omit the point that Trump's government (ab)used the feminazi term before anyone else did. Is Trump's government leftist?
Delete@Anonymous: At least I name myself.
Indeed, it is irritating when you agree with someone and support them, but instead of acknowledging this, they look for ways to disagree with and lecture you...Very odd.
Delete@ Captain Crown. Of course I did, because it is irrelevant to this conversation and impossible to prove. It doesn't matter who first used a particular term, what matters is its common use. In any case I've already explained that the terms "Femi-nazi" and "Patri-nazi" are euphemistic and used figuratively, therefore should not be taken too seriously or cause that much offence.
DeleteSince I am not allowed to disagree with you, Xaan, I have a question to ask you. Is Trump's government leftist?
DeleteI didn't say you weren't allowed to disagree with me. I said it is irritating when people who you agree with, look for ways to disagree for the sake of it.
DeleteWhy would you ask such a pointless question of me, if you had read and understood my previous comment?
No, I don't disagree for the sake of it. I have my positions and stand by them. Also, my question about Trump's government is far from pointless. Or did you suddenly forget about the feminazi term and how they and their supporters abuse it?
DeleteIn that case what were you doing by telling me to "Judge more carefully the history of national socialism." When all I had done was to defend your right to use the term "Patri-nazi"??
DeleteYour question about Trump is completely pointless because you were directing it at me and I had already explained to you that even if there was any indisputable proof that someone from The Trump administration was the first to use the term "Femi-nazi" (which there simply cannot be as it would be impossible to prove that no-one on the planet had used it before) Then it still wouldn't make Trump, his administration or anyone on the right responsible for everyone who uses that term. On top of that I have also explained (twice now) that it is euphemistic, therefore not equivalent of calling someone an actual "Nazi".
Now if you are not capable of addressing the points that I am making and instead insist on merely repeating your original point over and over again, then this conversation is over.
This time I took the conversation from the top and saw the comment you now refer to. When I posted the "Since I am not allowed to disagree with you" comment, it was not up. Then I just replied to what I saw without scrolling so how would I see it... Anyway. It truly isn't so important who used the feminazi term first. I ought to have focused on who let it loose on the mainstream media. What a difference that makes since the answer is still Trump's lot, one could ask. That said, you are clearly wrong about the responsibility part, especially considering how heavily brainwashed the average USA citizen apparently is and how old the internet is. Most (if not all) governments abuse money for the sake of staying in power, so you should expect part of this abused money to go into paid trolls that will deliberately abuse some term or play some other trick to pass into society a carefully designed message. Of course I won't claim to have the solid proof with names etc, but I bet you don't have proof against the said statement. If you are a woman, you must know from experience whether to trust a patrinazi. And what with the feminazi term being as you say "euphemistic"? Why it is (ab)used is what matters. Since they use it to discourage us from our rights, we can't just sit and concede it. They call us feminazis, they are patrinazis. If you 're still going to defend Trump, then damn yes this conversation is over.
DeleteI did post an almost complete response, which is still not up. If next time I check it does not appear, I will expose the one point I purposedly omitted. This conversation will be over when I say so. Censoring does absolutely no good at this point. Why? Because in your latest post you have made a mistake that explains a lot about you. Care to find it? Or will you also censor yourself?
DeleteSorry to intervene with something only partly relevant to your debate. In Trump's America, men's MLS is being played but the women's season was cancelled due to coronavirus. At the same time, women's divisions in most European countries continue without problems. Dictatorship is the real virus.
Delete@ Captain Crown: Yet you still did not address the example I gave of you disagreeing for the sake of it? I've gone from defending your right to use a word, to somehow "defending Trump", even though I've debunked your assertion that he or anyone in his administration could be responsible for the use of that word, in exactly the same way that I would if you had accused Obama's admin of the same thing. And since you have used an equivalent term, doesn't that make you a hypocrite?
DeleteI'm afraid it is incumbent on you to prove the points you are making. Merely saying there is no proof to the contrary really isn't good enough. This blog is not about party politics and it would be far better if you could be more constructive about female empowerment instead of starting petty, irrelevant arguments with people who fundamentally mostly agree with you...
You have not debunked my assertion about the responsibility for the popularity of the feminazi term abuse. You have only denied it. Me using the patrinazi term is not enough to make me a hypocrite. I am just using it as a revenge term against patrinazis, not abusing it like they do with feminazi to any woman who simply defends her rights. Can't tell the difference? Try living in Greece...
DeleteAll this "petty irrelevant argument" would never happen if you didn't try to impose an illegitimate frame around my right to use the patrinazi term. I have my own frame for how to use it and how not, as it occurs from the first paragraph of this post. And If I 'm being honest, your choice to place that frame of yours as "defending" for my said right doesn't say good things about your own politics.
Oh, so the fact you have no actual proof of your claim, doesn't debunk your assertion? Ok. I have been hearing the term Femi-nazi for years before Trump came to power, in fact you can probably find it being used on this blog way before 2016. It's not a term I've ever taken that seriously. Men are very sensitive to the threat posed by women, perceived or otherwise, so they lash out with the most offensive thing they can think of. We should actually take great satisfaction in the knowledge of how genuinely scared they are whenever we hear this term.
DeleteBy the same token, I don't mind anyone using the term "Patri-nazi" and once again. I DEFENDED your right to use it, so what's all this nonsense about "illegitimate frames"? You have picked an argument with someone who fundamentally agrees with you..Why not save it for someone who doesn't?
You are forgetting about one feeling: disgust. That is what I feel when someone uses the feminazi term against either me or any other woman who simply defends her rights. Also, that is what I feel about how you communicate the matter of my right to use the patrinazi term. I have explained the frame within which I use the term. I don't need you to define whether I use a term euphemistically or literally. That was your mistake.
DeleteOne more thing. My "lack of proof" refers to whether there are paid trolls or all this tendency of term abuse is just because of bad education practises all over the planet. The only sure fact on this matter is that most terms are abused one way or another. Regarding which political wing supports sexism there is SOLID PROOF of it being the right. Trump is one example, Greece's "Golden Dawn" literal neonazi formation is another, Erdogan wants Turk women to wear that stupid thing on their heads and generally all the bad countries for a woman to live in are under dictatorship (albeit several of them abuse terms such as "freedom", "security", "democracy" and "communism" to disguise their nazi positions). Or are you going to claim that Trump is a leftist, Mihaloliakos is a leftist, Erdogan is a leftist etc? And before you "debunk" me by mentioning that "Golden Dawn" is not even in the parliament, I assure you on two things. One is, they are very well present in our society. The other is, Mitsotakis is also a dictator. Are you sure you will be able to debunk these?
@ Captain Crown: I've just explained why you shouldn't feel disgust. All you are doing is playing into the hands of the ones hurling that insult. So you feel disgusted that I defended your rights??? Ok, well that would explain your continued rant. I guess there is just no pleasing some people.
DeleteIn my experience sexism is less common on the right. Right wing conservative parties have produced two female Prime Ministers here in the UK, while left wing parties have produced none. In fact the left wing party here in the UK has never even had a female leader and it just failed again recently in that endeavour, despite having a mostly female short list...
I do not accept your "explanation". Did you, or did you not, try to define that I used the patrinazi term euphemistically? You did and you know it full well. What you don't seem to get is how this constitutes the frame you define as "defence". My disgust is exactly towards the difference between the truth and your definition of it. What is so complicated about this?
DeleteRegarding the political matter, I have two questions.
1)What did your two female prime ministers do for our rights?
2)Who participates in party leader selection in the UK?
@ Hellfirequeen....err I mean Captain Crown: Well that is your problem and you will just have to go through life being disgusted and bitter.
DeleteNo, I just said that I view those terms as euphemistic as they are a play on words and I don't believe most people would be childish enough to mean them literally. So if you did mean the term "Patri-nazi" to be literal, then as I explained before, I think you are being childish and ridiculous as well as ignorant of history.
To answer your questions: The first female PM created a booming, service based economy which gave countless women the opportunity to enter the work place and become financially independent. The second female PM wasn't around long enough to be judged on this matter, but your original point was about the political right wing being sexist - 2 females being voted in as party leaders proves otherwise - so of course you have to change the subject.
Secondly, In both cases, the entire party membership votes for the party. leader
@ Anonymous: Not sure what MLS is, but I know that the extent of covid lockdown restrictions are decided by individual state authorities, so I highly doubt that is a presidential decision.
ReplyDeleteMLS stands for Major League Soccer. It is a national division, not limited to specific states. The women's top division is also nationwide, so this double standard under the excuse of coronavirus is obviously a presidential decision. It is his revenge against Megan Rapinoe's rightful protesting. Female empowerment has certain political opponents. Trump is one of them. Or did I miss something truly spectacular?
DeleteOk, so it's just a feeling you have...there's no actual proof? Yeah I get the whole "Orange man bad" thing. My view would be that no woman should allow herself to be in a position where her ability to earn a living, or anything else for that matter, can be decided by a man.
DeleteI have to respond to this. Anonymous clearly explains that both top divisions are nationwide, not limited to specific states. I assume you can look that up before you rush to call on "feelings". Men play like before covid, but women's season has been rendered void "because of covid". Does that not smell excuse to you? Here we have a saying: now that we found a priest, let's bury 5-6. (Hint: covid is the "priest" here.) I agree with your position, but it isn't like many countries have enough female voice in their political structures, is it? The solution is to only vote for women, specifically those who provenly fight for our rights. Just moaning a position does not solve a problem. Working for the solution does.
DeleteThe proof is right in front of you. The top divisions for both genders are not limited to specific states. Besides this, the matter is not so much about money as it is about our right to be in proper physical condition. What is your blog about if it isn't about our physical empowerment?
Delete@ Anonymous: Whilst it does seem grossly unfair that the men's season is continuing, but the women's isn't, I still find it hard to believe that this is due to an intervention by the POTUS and would need some kind of evidence before I join in the condemnation. The circumstances on their own don't constitute proof.
DeleteOf course the blog is about female physical empowerment, but let's identify correctly where the challenges to this lie. If we don't bother to do that, then we are just wasting our time...
You do have a point about official proof here, but to get that you would need the relevant official documents from the USA government, wouldn't you? Or do you think the mainstream media would let people know of something so revealing of the covid fraud when they are still trying to terrorise us with it? The best proof we can have here is the combination of facts. There are five key facts this circumstance consists of:
Delete1)USA women's season void while MLS goes on
2)USA women's season void while most other countries did not cancel their women's seasons
3)USA women's season void just after Trump's disrespectful behaviour towards Megan Rapinoe during the 2019 World Cup
4)USA women's season void "because of coronavirus"
5)Trump accuses Obama for funding the lab that created the virus, when in fact Obama passed a law Dr Fauci broke. Now, instead of being imprisoned, Fauci is the USA's Tsiodras. The mainstream media cover him, but that doesn't make him anyhow innocent. The mainstream media themselves are not innocent.
Clearly this is a political decision of Trump's, or at least a decision he had some major part in. He is not the only one to pose a challenge to female empowerment, but that does not mean he doesn't pose such a challenge at all. Guilty. Case closed.
So you mean Trump is not a challenge to us? Then Captain Crown is right, you are defending him.
DeleteRight, so you have zero evidence of Trump's involvement in this decision - just wild conjecture? Just saying something over and over doesn't make it so. I would defend anyone who is being falsely accused of doing something with zero evidence.
DeletePfff, american humour...
DeleteAll men are a challenge to us in one form or another. I just don't see how Donald Trump is any worse than anyone else. I've certainly yet to hear any actual evidence that he is. I wouldn't normally indulge a conversation about politics on this blog as it can be very devise, however as this is an open thread, I guess it doesn't hurt.
DeleteFor me, being an Amazon is about seeking the truth, not just following the crowd. If you want to believe that someone is bad, just because one group of people tell you they are - that's up to you, but it usually won't lead you to the truth...
Could we talk about female supremacy?
ReplyDeleteIt would be nice, wouldn't it?
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteMost males are in denial about being the weaker sex. And it's not just about muscular strength, but mental, emotional, and physiological strength that women are superior to males.
DeleteFemale supremacy isn't just about 'reversing' patriarchal roles. Female led society will be based on ways of doing things that will completely change the roles of the sexes in ways we can't really know until it happens. But if you really look at what happens in most circumstances where women become dominant in previously male-controlled settings, the whole game changes. Since women are better than men at just about any task you can name, reversing the roles is a recipe for failure. Males cannot replace women in the old female roles because frankly, men wouldn't be up to the task. Whatever role males end up with in a Female run world will be decided by women, but I wouldn't expect men to find themselves 'replacing' women in anything.
Well said yboy. As long as I lived alone, I couldn't get the quality of life I was getting before thanks to my mother and her super intelligence. Thankfully I got lucky and fell in love with a massive muscular woman, who all of a sudden set things straight again with her decisions. Babis
Deletewhat can be done for the Blog to grow more?
ReplyDeleteMore interaction is the short answer. Until more women who look at this blog step forward from the shadows and ask the questions, give their opinions, engage in conversation, meet like minds etc. I'm afraid it is pretty uninspiring for me to add much to the blog...
DeleteWell, there's a combined 116 replies to the last two post. I would say that's plenty of interest!
DeleteDon't know if this has been already psoted, but it's a very interesting article on why women are better ultra-endurance athletes than men:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.bbc.com/news/world-49284389
these are the main takeaways.
Fiona Kolbinger finised 10 HOURS ahead of her closest male cometitor even though it was her FIRST uktra-cycling event.
She was hoping for women's podium at best but she was surprised at how superior she was to the men
Jamsin Parks beat her best male competitor by 12 HOURS even though SHE HAD TO STOP ALL THE TIME TO BREAST MILK.
Katie Wright beat 40 men and six other women to win the Riverhead Backyard ReLaps Ultra-marathon in New Zealand. That means she was on the top 14.3 percentile of women and the TOP 2.4 PERCENTILE OF THE MEN.
Women have more endurance. Their superior muscle fibers make them more resistance to fatigue.
Women have better oxygen efficiency
Women are mentally tougher
Women are more intelligent. Many men zoom off quickly guided by their little pricks and end they soon slow down, suffer hypothermia and freeze their little pricks.
Women cope better with emotions, while men crumble under fatigue, sleep deprivation and confusion.
Child birth helps make women tougher than men
Ann Trason was breaking records and beating men in ultra-endurance marathons in the late 1980s until 2004. She held the title of ultra-runner of the year for more than a decade and broke 20 world records in distances ranging from 40 to 100 miles.
There used to be hardly any women in ultra.endurance. Now, even though they're still a small minority, they're still beating men left and right.
Thanks for sharing that article! I've never read it before. And that's exactly what I'm looking for! It shows with no doubt how women beat men in ultra-endurance. That's such a proof of female supremacy!
Delete@femalesaresuperior , Thanks for that nice list of Female advantages over the inferior sex. The list just gets longer every day! I especially like to see the ultra events where the Female advantage just gets bigger the longer and tougher the race goes on.
DeleteThat is a really interesting article and one that conferms what many of us suspected. I don't have any experience with ultra distance events, but in the context of a much shorter timeframe, I do have a fare amount of experience now rolling and competing with women in Jiu Jitsu. It is pretty much understood that if you have any chance of winning you have to go all out in the begining and hope you get the result you want. The longer the match the stronger the female gets and the weaker the male gets. There is nothing worse than that feeling.
Delete@Brad "The longer the match the stronger the female gets and the weaker the male gets." You said there is "nothing worse than that feeling" but that's only the male perspective. Wouldn't you agree it must be a really good feeling from the perspective of the stronger sex?
DeleteWell yes that would be the other side of the coin.
DeleteOf course the the feeling of your strength deteriorating as your opponent only grows stronger as they sense victory sucks no matter what the gender of your adversary, but I have found that females seem to have this killer instinct that really comes out when they sense their opponent is in trouble. Maybe I am imagining that but I don't thinks so. While I have to endure it from time to time on the mat, it seems to be playing it self out on a much broader scale in societal trends as well.
@Brad No, you're not imagining that. When I wrestle my boyfriend, I can figure out easily when the fight has left out of him. Till that moment, I'm largely defensive, letting him under the illusion that his strong muscles can subdue me. But later, becoming the aggressor, he submits within minutes.
DeleteWhat happens on the mat is a manifestation of the societal trends. Seeing the power slipping away from their hands, most men fight back and find themselves on the losing end. Not saying that even if some of them submit, they don't have to endure beating from the superior gender...
Awesome - Couldn't agree more ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
DeleteThanks Xaan! Recently discovered this blog and couldn't seem to relate more with the topics and comments here... I hope both women and men lose their confusion as to who is the superior gender and accept the truth!
Delete@ WomenRule. I got into wrestling at an early age purely because I wanted to fight boys. I don't know why, but it has always been a powerful instinct in me and there is nothing on this earth that I love more than beating them. and I have never lost a fight with a boy or man on or off the mat. Men don't seem capable of playing the long game in a fight and you're right, there is a definite point where you know they are spent, usually by about the 01:30 mark. Then you can flick the aggression switch, go full bitch queen on him and finish it real quick! I just wish more girls had the confidence to try it, we really could have an Amazon nation. Thank you Xaan for this site, I love it! Staci x
DeleteThanks Staci. This is exactly what we need. Much love ❤️
DeleteStaci: Women have more stamina than we have. As a wrestler, I know that if the fight is during too long, I will lose for sure. I'm exhausted faster than the women. 1: 30 is already quite long for a man who fights full force. For me I would say the mark is about 1 or 1:15. So, I try to pin quickly. But, I've also be pinned by some women within one minute.
DeleteIf you watch any mixed match on YouTube the pattern is usually the same. The boy starts flailing his arms and legs until he soon gets winded and ends up lying immobile and exhausted in the girl's clutches. The girls play with the boys like a spider playing with a fly.
Delete@femalesaresuperior Hopefully, it's not always the same. There are examples on YT where the boys win too.
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxxCnTRJjdk
See that collection of pins!
Hi im new here. Female aged 20, love this kind of stuff. I do a lot of training myself. Love watching men get beat, huge turn on for me. Im sure more women feel the same, just society is still backward about it.
ReplyDeleteWhat training do you do, if I may ask? Babis
DeleteWhat training are you into? And have you ever beaten a guy? Please, tell us more!
DeleteDoes she want to tell? That is what matters. Babis
DeleteWelcome to the Sisterhood! You sound like a fully qualified Amazon already. Your contribution to the discussion would be most valuable.❤️
DeleteThats weird, i used my google name, but is showing up unknown.
ReplyDeleteWelcome...Did you sign in with your Google account?
DeleteYes i did
DeleteHow odd? Oh well, please feel free to contribute anyway.....you can always sign off with your name or Amazon name?
DeleteYes sounds like a plan. Really enjoying this site.
DeleteKarenH
Xaan i assume you run it ?.
DeleteKarenH
Well, I try...can never seen to devote that much time to it these days. I moderate the comments and encourage debate, but don't allow abuse or trolling..
DeleteVery exciting blog... Till now I thought I was among the very few who got beaten up and humiliated by a girl, but this blog shows that isn't quite rare, in fact a sign of things to come. Keep the good content coming!
ReplyDelete#iamshatterproof tough girls beat boys and men
ReplyDeletehttps://www.thequint.com/voices/women/iamshatterproof-tough-girls-beat-boys-says-divya-sain
🤼♀️👊🏽💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽🤘🏽💄👊🏽❤️❤️❤️
Polegirl 💋
Polegirl: Thanks for that link! That girl is very skilled and impressive. She rules, beating men in a very macho context. She's a very good examples for everybody!
DeleteThe boys look so vulnerable fighting her. 0:48 says it all. Imagine watchingthat and still thinking women are the "weaker sex".
DeleteSince no one is posting recently, I'd thought I'd post something to keep this thread alive.
ReplyDeleteHere is an article from last year. If anybody here is from Glascow, and has some news about this, please tell us about it. Here are the first few paragraphs and a link to the full article below.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-50671825
Women should be allowed to fight men in karate competitions, according to instructor Ben Fail.
He says that although men and women spar together, it is unusual to see them take each other on in competition.
"Karate is about control and technique so, for me, gender doesn't even come in to it," Ben says.
Five years ago, he held a mixed-gender competition for under 16s at his Glasgow club, which invited other clubs to join in.
Ben says the idea was not fully welcomed by other coaches because they were unsure of breaking the tradition of gender segregation within competitions - even though opposite genders fight each other in training classes in other clubs too.
Interesting article - Thanks for posting. Of course we know the real reason for the reticence around mixed competition. Traditional thinking is that men are the best fighters. Mixed competitions would expose this as being completely untrue and provide the perfect motivation for females to excel in the sport, to the point they become dominant.
DeleteFemales becoming dominant is exactly the greatest fear in the male psyche. One of the most powerful instincts that males have is to compensate for their inferiority to women. Males instinctively know that females are superior but are also naturally troubled by this reality and so they work to suppress it.
DeleteThe creation of male-only physical competition is one of the most carefully guarded of all patriarchal bastions since the most obvious area of natural male inferiority is physical. Male envy of female physiological power drives men to belittle and demean what they themselves do not possess and to keep women under male control.
These days, patriarchy is falling apart of its own built in flaws. It couldn't last forever. Female physical power is no secret, and it's just a matter of time before female superiority and dominance in every area of society is fully established.
Some males welcome the defeat of patriarchy and cheer the rise of the powerful female. That number will certainly grow. After all, if we can all appreciate the highest levels of human potential, we can recognize that it is women who are that potential's embodiment.
A number of years ago I took Karate for about two months and then had to stop as my schedule wouldn't permit it. The Head sensi was a women who was one of the most terifying fighters I have every seen. During my short time there I never got to witness this, but there were many strories of how, owver the years diffent guys would get cocky and try to chanllenge her. Word was she always made sure to put them in their place in a way that left no doubt in anyones mind who the top dog was. Watching her, I couldn't imgagine anyone beign stupid enough to take her on, but I guees there are alway going to be men that are threatened by females like her. I have no other Karate dojo to compare it to, but in her dojo there were several women who were superior to almost all ( if not all) the men.
Deleteoh my god please no! I enjoy watching women triumph over men but to legitimize it on such a mass scale would destroy many young men! The display of female supremacy would tip the balance of power to women's favour. I prefer mixed fights to stay underground.
Delete@gnome mage, I hope you're not serious that legitimizing female triumph over males would 'destroy many young men'.
DeleteThe healthiest thing for males would be to learn that their claims to superiority and even their claims to equality with women are incorrect. Reenforcing the myth of female weakness and protecting the fragile male ego is exactly what's wrong with patriarchy.
Boys can learn that male strength can be expressed by being strong enough to accept their inferiority to women.
I am a female supremacist and i embrace female supremacy as a way of life. But my journey has not been easy, i was beaten by girls in boxing in front of my own girlfriend and she cheered for my female opponent instead of me. When my girlfriend saw how weak men are she decided to wear the pants in the relationship. it took me a while but now i have totally accepted the power dynamics in our relationship. My girlfriend has been kind to me i know there are women that are less so.
DeleteI'd imagine the same process is not going to be as smooth for every boys and it might be bumpy to unplug everyone too quickly from the matrix...
I wouldn't mind a bumpy road towards something worth the ride.
Deletejust talked to a gym trainer today and he rubbished the idea women cant have high upper body strength. He said women can be stronger than men pound for pound. He had seen some pretty petit girl doing 14 pull ups while bigger guys cant do 3.
ReplyDeleteWow! I always upper body strength is the only place men can compare well and looks like i am wrong on this one!
I told you all. The real woman is stronger than the man.
DeletePeople mistake muscle size for strength. Males have bigger muscles on average because they are bigger on average. As you probably know, scientific research and testing has demonstrated that when examined on the basis of pure, lean muscle fibre, there is no real difference between the strength of male and female muscle when they are the same size and weight. But the difference comes when those muscles are put to the test. Male muscles may be equal to female muscles under the microscope when they are inert, but under stress, working hard, female muscles outperform male muscles by enormous margins, often twice the endurance and resistance to fatigue. The reasons for this are not agreed upon, but the evidence suggests that there are at least several factors. The female nervous system is better at transmitting more signals to women's muscles and activating more of the muscle and the female circulatory system is better at ensuring blood flow to the muscles to prevent buildup of harmful acids which cause fatigue. Add to that the fact that estrogen is better at protecting muscle fibres and keeping them flexible while testosterone actually damages muscles even though it also is a factor in making male muscles grow bigger. The paradox of male muscles is that the very thing that makes them big and 'appear' to be stronger is also the thing that makes them less efficient and less resilient.
DeleteSo strength cannot be measured merely based on the inert structure of muscle tissue, but on effort over time. An initial burst of strength means very little if a male is worn out soon after while a female maintains her strength far longer.
Many people don't even consider size, they expect the man to be stronger just because he is the man. Dumb but true. The real woman is stronger per size, bigger, more resistant to fatigue and still more explosive, more agile than men. Her athletic ability is way beyond men's ultimate limits.
DeleteI can confirm that. I've seen guys who apparently looked strong miserably failing to complete one pitiful pull up, while apparently dainty girls do many of them with ease.
Delete@Anonymous, Good point. People 'expect' the man to be stronger even if he's smaller. For some reason it's often assumed that even an athletic woman must be weaker than an untrained male. Female potential is indeed beyond the limits of the male. This is what males have always been afraid of and women in the past have simply allowed male fear of female superiority to impose limits on the superior sex. But this is changing fast.
Delete@yboy Speaking of muscles, the other day I saw a couple out jogging and the guy suddenly stopped because he was having a contracture. His girlfriend waited impatiently as he tried to stretch the contracture away. When they finally got going he stopped again after a few steps looking like he was in pain. He told her to keep going and she ran away lightly and effortlessly as he walked behind her, looking defeated and humilliated.
Delete@femalesaresuperior, That's a scene that plays out more and more frequently.
Delete@yboy If they were running away from a predator she would have got away and he would have been devoured to death.
Delete@femalesaresuperior,
DeleteSo true. Nature ensures the survival of the more important members of the species by making males are more expendable.
@yboy Men are expendable by nature. In a future amazon utopia I see men farmed and mikled for sperm.
Delete@femalesaresuperior, Certainly the fate of the male sex will be decided by women. The rise of female power has already gone beyond the point of no return. The exact turning point is not clear, maybe it was when Nettie Stevens discovered the difference between the male Xy chromosome structure and the female XX structure that patriarchy was given its death sentence. After all, it's hard to convince women that they are inferior to males when science has just proved the opposite.
Delete@femalesaresuperior, i read a book about amazon utopia legends a long time ago. Allow me to share this. It speaks of a queen who revolt against her queen and founded her own amazon queendom with her court servants. In this queendom, men have little to no rights. men cannot practice martial arts or strength training, only women do. and men cannot turn down a women's marriage proposal. men stay at home and do all the house work and are obligated by law to provide his wife sexual satisfaction, or maybe punished by castration. Quite a scary place to live in as a men if you think so.
DeleteGnomemage you’re right of course that amazon utopia sounds very scary for men, but if you think about it our whole civilisation has been built around the opposite, with up until recently women having little or no rights and only now are exploring their physical potential and discovering that actually we are a lot weaker than them, I guess our fate could be how much mercy we receive when the balance of power shifts. Of course some men will resist like in the premise/prediction of the Gunrunners story, but they are doomed to be beaten. Happily I will surrender, I think it is natural for men to do so (as it is for women to dominate) and it would be liberating for men I think. I just hope we still have some rights and are forgiven for how men treated the mistress gender in the past
DeleteHi everyone. Apparently Xaan can't access the blog for the time being due to technical problems and told me to let you know. I'll tell if I have any news.
ReplyDelete