There are multiple videos on the channel where teams of boys and girls face off, which of course usually end in complete female victory. There's even more cases like this one, where the boys outnumber the girls, but they are still defeated by their stronger opponents. The very first one says that the girls actually challenged a bigger team of boys. They were confident enough to know that an even battle of the sexes would be too easy for them, so they had to give the boys an advantage. But just like in this video, the outnumbered girls conquered the boys with ease. These videos show multiple levels of female superiority. First, the girls are able to work together better than the boys and overcome their disadvantage. And second, each girl is able to individually outclass her male opponent, or in some cases, several male opponents. I know that the result of this kind of contest is the same in wrestling, and probably would be in other sports as well.
@TwentyfirstStarter: Not only are the girls clearly the better athletes, they have a lot of fun in the process. Also the male coach seems to be totally on board with girl power. I'd think that these boys are learning to respect their female superiors and to be satisfied with their male limitations. (Could it be that the few videos on this channel where the boys seem to win might be just the girls deciding to let the boys win out of charity?)
I think that's definitely the case, yboy. The boys would probably quit or give up if the girls didn't let them get any wins. Let's just hope the boys don't get cocky because of the given victories, or else they're in for a nasty lesson in girl power.
Boys will always get cocky even when they know deep inside that they are facing a superior female opponent. Frankly I believe that we males actually want to lose these battles. It's in our programming. I call it the "praying mantis syndrome" Nature is full of examples of males offering themselves up to females as prey.
What kind of numbers advantage do you think would be "fair"? I'd say 2.5 men for every woman would provide a decent challenge, but that may be too few.
It depends on what you mean by fair. If you mean just to challenge the girls, 2.5 boys per girl could work. But if the boys want any chance of winning, they're definitely going to need more.
I help run a BJJ / Grappling club like the one in the video clip. We increasingly have to match girls with older boys as the girls are just getting too good and too strong for boys their own age. Even then the girls win most of the time. I've seen girls as young as 12 embarrass boys as old as 16 on many occasions, even 17 a couple of times. Not sure about 18 year-olds, but the way girls are advancing in the sport, it is bound to happen. Carol
I've totally accepted the fact that women are superior but thinking of a match where 2 12 year old girls totally demolish 5 18 year old boys still comes as a shock to me. Realizing that we men are so pathetic and weak.
My wife is into karate and often helps with teaching the younger kids and she has said often enough that a lot of boys don't want to spar against girls their own age because they hit or kick too hard. These girls have to be pitted against boys a couple years older. So what happens at your BJJ club also happens at her karate club. Tasslehoff
Like Carol said, girls are more than capable of beating boys older than them, but 12 to 18 is a big gap, so it's pretty difficult to judge how exactly those matches would go. Carol, has your club ever held team girl vs boy battle like the one in the video?
wrestling and tug of war, from my own experience easy for the girls hardly a contest, football and basketball may be a fairer match, especially the basketball, the boys height may swing it, but the well trained girls with their speed agility and reflexes, I don't know... Paul
Let us know how it goes if you are sable to organize a match. It's great that the girls are confidant enough in themselves that they'd want to take on a team of boys. Based on how you said the boys are being overpowered and outclassed by the girls, they might be harder to convince, but with a numbers advantage they're sure to think they have the upper hand.
This is not exactly my idea of easy. Yes, the girls' victory was clear, but I 've taken part in much easier victories over males (regardless if on my own or as part of a team).
I find it easier to do as part of a team, as males often tend to struggle with teamwork. Even on my own though I 'll not pretend to face serious difficulties either. Men are weak, even just my existence is proof for their weakness.
Women can process oxygen more quickly than men when they start to exercise, according to a new study from the University of Waterloo.
Quick oxygen uptake places less strain on the body's cells and is considered an important measure of aerobic fitness.
"The findings are contrary to the popular assumption that men's bodies are more naturally athletic," said Thomas Beltrame, lead author on the study.
The study compared oxygen uptake and muscle oxygen extraction between 18 young men and women of similar age and weight during treadmill exercise. Women consistently outperformed men with around 30 per cent faster oxygen handling throughout the body.
"We found that women's muscles extract oxygen from the blood faster, which, scientifically speaking, indicates a superior aerobic system," said Richard Hughson, a professor in the Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, and Schlegel Research Chair in Vascular Aging and Brain Health at Waterloo.
By processing oxygen faster, women are less likely to accumulate molecules linked with muscle fatigue, effort perception and poor athletic performance.
"While we don't know why women have faster oxygen uptake, this study shakes up conventional wisdom," said Beltrame. "It could change the way we approach assessment and athletic training down the road."
No "it could". It has to. Playing soft with such hard facts just because they happen to oppose conventional "wisdom" (conventional what?) is clearly irresponsible behaviour which I absolutely prohibit. Silvia
Silvia, Of course the article tries to soften the blow to the fragile male ego by using phrases like "it could" ... of course the facts do more than "shake up conventional wisdom" ... they explode foolish male myths.
Sounds like rounds in boxing don't last long. If it takes a whole 12 rounds to wear a man off, I do see how it can take a whole 2 rounds to knock him out, as it seems that one round doesn't last long enough for a fighter to complete a move. Elise
In my case was even 1 round too long: after half a minute playfull sparring she got more serious and needed just about 10 sec to deliver me a devastating and crushing KO.
"Stay the hell away from him" doesn't sound to me like any sort of toying. The female boxer's trainer simply wanted to prevent the man's momentary peak power from going for a rushed knockout. Men score much higher at peak power than they do at average power, so wearing him off nerfed his strongest point and abolished any "cheap loss" risk the girl would otherwise be running. She may be able to beat him at his own game too, but I guess we 'll never get to know. Constantina
On the Internet we often see how small women (or young girls) can defeat bigger, sometimes much bigger guys. But imagine how it is when guys meet women much taller and bigger than them. My cousin is very tall (6’4 or 193 cm) and visibly strong. She told me how, in occasions of conflict, the average guys are intimidated and even paralysed when they see they don’t have their unique advantage over women : size. She doesn’t need to fight, she just has to stand up and come close to the guy and the guy retreats. The guys are just not used to it so the intimidation works much better than when a big man does it.
@blamat, I'm a taller than average male, so when I find myself standing next to a woman who is my size I can concur that it is indeed very intimidating to experience the presence of female power without my usual male size advantage. I am already aware of the many physical advantages a woman has even when she is smaller than me, but a woman who is my own size or bigger than me is simply overwhelming to my male ego. I can hold my own against another male my size, but there's a difference with a female. Maybe it's a woman's legs and hips which seem (and are) much stronger than a male's which make a woman seem so much more balanced and solid when compared with the 'top heavy' male body. Males have relatively weak legs and a higher center of gravity which makes us easier to knock down. A woman's body is built on a much more sturdy foundation with a larger more solid pelvis that can wreak havoc on a male.
I am a rather tall girl myself (178 cm) and I think it helped me realize more quickly that I could be stronger than men. Height is not very important for strength/fighting (in my opinion) but it gives you confidence. Do most girls on this website are tall ?
I'm also considered quite tall and it certainly helps in terms of strength, leverage and sheer intimidation. But I also know you don't have to be tall to be a tough girl. I know plenty of shorter muscle-packed girls who can rip any guy apart. Tasha
I only stand at 1,66m but that doesn't stop me from easy victories over guys in freestyle wrestling as well as armwrestling. I know of several women taller than 1,80m as well as several men below 1,65m - so you understand that we aren't as short a gender as we 're told to be. Don't buy the trick of showing the tallest men and the shortest women as "average" and "norm". And Tasha you 're right about many shorter girls being able to rip any guy apart. We have something men don't, I have no idea what it is, but surely enough it works wonders. Athena
Would you say that your legs are what you use most to beat guys? Girls always use their legs to win when I wrestle against them, even if they're capable of using just their upper body to overpower me. You might want to give Greco-Roman wrestling a try too. If you're able to easily dominate males in arm wrestling, then you would probably dominate them in that form of wrestling as well.
I don't care what part of my body I use most, I know I can use any part necessary, at any time. I understand there is enormous difference of leg strength in favour of women, though the point of freestyle is the ability to use any part at any time. I 've had a few wins in Greco-Roman as well, but I prefer freestyle because I like its freedom of choices. My wins in armwrestling are all due to guys challenging me. I tried refusing once, but I was called coward and thrown stuff at, so I changed my mind and taught everyone a lesson. Athena
Sorry to hear that you were harassed for refusing, but at least you showed them in the end. I've learned not to challenge girls to arm wrestling, and hopefully those guys did too.
Thank you Xaan for your kind remark, but I am not the only one to teach the guys lessons on strength. All my friends have all their easy wins against guys. Moreover I do not ride a horse...
21st, there will always be that one guy who thinks he can beat everyone. Until he challenges me or another girl from here, that is... Athena
Haha, I also used to think that guys can beat girls easily at arm wrestling, until one day, a girl from my class challenged me to arm wrestle(just for fun), We wrestled 3 times and all times I lost. It hurted my ego a lot, but we need to accept it, its ultimate truth that girls are better than boys at everything, studies, sports or whatever, they beat us.
It’s funny how men don’t take advantage of their bigger bodies or at least their size is not enough. I do swimming at a competitive level in my university and last month at the pool, we, the female swimming team, were talking with the male team. They teased us by saying that professional women will never beat professional men because nature gave them significantly smaller feet (everything being equal, big feet gives a small edge because they work like palms. For instance, Ian Thorpe is size 54, Melissa Franklin size 46). They did a foot comparison to show us, and they had bigger feet than all of us. But then, the girl with the smallest feet challenged the boy with the biggest feet at 100m crawl, to prove them wrong. So it was size 39 vs size 48 and also a 20 cm difference, both of them were considered having a good swimming technique. She defeated him. She went out of the water laughing, she told him “Apparently clown feet is not enough ! Do you even know how to use them ?”. Angela
I would say it's our size not being enough, not that we don't want to take advantage of it. I wrestle girls with thinner arms and legs then I have, but they're still able to overpower me in tests of strength. I think girls are able to surpass us in sports because their muscles are more efficient and because their bodies as a whole are stronger than ours, even if we are stronger in one specific area.
Angela, I also got feet size mentionned to me. I made fun of a guy for his lack of flexibility during a yoga class and he said "ok, but thanks for my big wide feet I am sure I got a better balance than you". We tried the exercice where you have to stand on one leg and guess what he clearly did not have the better balance ^^
That would be an easy guess, had you let us try it. In spite of the myth about men being able to stand better than us on one foot, I 've been through numerous various incidents where men were proved miserably unbalanced. In general, men like to have appointments with history, but somehow they 're always delayed by mythology. Alexia
Male mythology is full of contradictions, just like everything about maleness. Masculine identity is built on lies and denials which are intended to hide our inner weakness. i think women have always known this. Now all the poorly woven threads of the fabric of patriarchy are unravelling and the whole unbalanced edifice will collapse. The future world in which Women have taken Their rightful place as leaders will be far better.
Even today the average woman is completely uninformed on this subject. Any conclusions drawn by experience alone can't be officially considered as knowledge. The best way to inform the uninformed is proper evidence. Thankfully this blog contains loads of it, although some gaps have yet to be filled as also pointed out by Constantina, if I remember well. Alexia
A girl in pigtails might look innocent but she will still destroy you.
Not only there were only 4 girls against 5 boys, but 2 of the 4 girls were white belts vs only 1 of the 5 boys.
The boys were genetically too unitelligent to think tactically al all. They just ran around like headless chickens and needed to be told what to do all the time. Without external help the girls' victory would have been even clearer.
Watching a yellow belt boy running scared of a white belt girl, then being smothered by her then run away scared again, this time disrobed and dispossesed of his yellow belt (like a symbolic castration) was very meaningful.
I have to agree. On so many levels the girls simply outperformed the boys, both individually and as a group. Very inspirational and I'm sure the girls will grow up more confident as they should do! Men have suppressed women for far too long. As for the boys, well I hope they too learn from the experience and respect women more as they grow up.
There are multiple videos on the channel where teams of boys and girls face off, which of course usually end in complete female victory. There's even more cases like this one, where the boys outnumber the girls, but they are still defeated by their stronger opponents. The very first one says that the girls actually challenged a bigger team of boys. They were confident enough to know that an even battle of the sexes would be too easy for them, so they had to give the boys an advantage. But just like in this video, the outnumbered girls conquered the boys with ease.
ReplyDeleteThese videos show multiple levels of female superiority. First, the girls are able to work together better than the boys and overcome their disadvantage. And second, each girl is able to individually outclass her male opponent, or in some cases, several male opponents. I know that the result of this kind of contest is the same in wrestling, and probably would be in other sports as well.
@TwentyfirstStarter: Not only are the girls clearly the better athletes, they have a lot of fun in the process. Also the male coach seems to be totally on board with girl power. I'd think that these boys are learning to respect their female superiors and to be satisfied with their male limitations. (Could it be that the few videos on this channel where the boys seem to win might be just the girls deciding to let the boys win out of charity?)
DeleteI think that's definitely the case, yboy. The boys would probably quit or give up if the girls didn't let them get any wins. Let's just hope the boys don't get cocky because of the given victories, or else they're in for a nasty lesson in girl power.
DeleteBoys will always get cocky even when they know deep inside that they are facing a superior female opponent. Frankly I believe that we males actually want to lose these battles. It's in our programming. I call it the "praying mantis syndrome" Nature is full of examples of males offering themselves up to females as prey.
DeleteWhat kind of numbers advantage do you think would be "fair"? I'd say 2.5 men for every woman would provide a decent challenge, but that may be too few.
DeleteIt depends on what you mean by fair. If you mean just to challenge the girls, 2.5 boys per girl could work. But if the boys want any chance of winning, they're definitely going to need more.
DeleteHmm, 2 12-year-olds vs 5 18-year-olds at, lets say
Delete1. Wrestling (Like above)
2. Basketball
3. Football
4. tug of war
How do you see those turning out?
I help run a BJJ / Grappling club like the one in the video clip. We increasingly have to match girls with older boys as the girls are just getting too good and too strong for boys their own age. Even then the girls win most of the time. I've seen girls as young as 12 embarrass boys as old as 16 on many occasions, even 17 a couple of times. Not sure about 18 year-olds, but the way girls are advancing in the sport, it is bound to happen. Carol
DeleteHi Nadia, Carol,
DeleteI've totally accepted the fact that women are superior but thinking of a match where 2 12 year old girls totally demolish 5 18 year old boys still comes as a shock to me. Realizing that we men are so pathetic and weak.
My wife is into karate and often helps with teaching the younger kids and she has said often enough that a lot of boys don't want to spar against girls their own age because they hit or kick too hard. These girls have to be pitted against boys a couple years older. So what happens at your BJJ club also happens at her karate club. Tasslehoff
Like Carol said, girls are more than capable of beating boys older than them, but 12 to 18 is a big gap, so it's pretty difficult to judge how exactly those matches would go. Carol, has your club ever held team girl vs boy battle like the one in the video?
Deletewrestling and tug of war, from my own experience easy for the girls hardly a contest, football and basketball may be a fairer match, especially the basketball, the boys height may swing it, but the well trained girls with their speed agility and reflexes, I don't know... Paul
DeleteNo, not yet but I'd love to organise something (unofficial of course). I know my girls will be up for it. Carol
DeleteLet us know how it goes if you are sable to organize a match. It's great that the girls are confidant enough in themselves that they'd want to take on a team of boys. Based on how you said the boys are being overpowered and outclassed by the girls, they might be harder to convince, but with a numbers advantage they're sure to think they have the upper hand.
DeleteThis is not exactly my idea of easy. Yes, the girls' victory was clear, but I 've taken part in much easier victories over males (regardless if on my own or as part of a team).
ReplyDeleteDo tell, what would you say was the worst you've ever humiliated a male...on your own OR as part of a team?
DeleteI find it easier to do as part of a team, as males often tend to struggle with teamwork. Even on my own though I 'll not pretend to face serious difficulties either. Men are weak, even just my existence is proof for their weakness.
DeleteGnome mage, thanks for that link ... very revealing of the true inequality of the sexes favoring the female!
ReplyDeleteHere is yet another scientific study proving the biological superiority of the female body and the superior muscles of women over males:
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2017-12/uow-wan120317.php
Women can process oxygen more quickly than men when they start to exercise, according to a new study from the University of Waterloo.
Quick oxygen uptake places less strain on the body's cells and is considered an important measure of aerobic fitness.
"The findings are contrary to the popular assumption that men's bodies are more naturally athletic," said Thomas Beltrame, lead author on the study.
The study compared oxygen uptake and muscle oxygen extraction between 18 young men and women of similar age and weight during treadmill exercise. Women consistently outperformed men with around 30 per cent faster oxygen handling throughout the body.
"We found that women's muscles extract oxygen from the blood faster, which, scientifically speaking, indicates a superior aerobic system," said Richard Hughson, a professor in the Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, and Schlegel Research Chair in Vascular Aging and Brain Health at Waterloo.
By processing oxygen faster, women are less likely to accumulate molecules linked with muscle fatigue, effort perception and poor athletic performance.
"While we don't know why women have faster oxygen uptake, this study shakes up conventional wisdom," said Beltrame. "It could change the way we approach assessment and athletic training down the road."
No "it could". It has to. Playing soft with such hard facts just because they happen to oppose conventional "wisdom" (conventional what?) is clearly irresponsible behaviour which I absolutely prohibit. Silvia
ReplyDeleteSilvia, Of course the article tries to soften the blow to the fragile male ego by using phrases like "it could" ... of course the facts do more than "shake up conventional wisdom" ... they explode foolish male myths.
ReplyDeleteSounds like rounds in boxing don't last long. If it takes a whole 12 rounds to wear a man off, I do see how it can take a whole 2 rounds to knock him out, as it seems that one round doesn't last long enough for a fighter to complete a move. Elise
ReplyDeleteIn my case was even 1 round too long: after half a minute playfull sparring she got more serious and needed just about 10 sec to deliver me a devastating and crushing KO.
ReplyDelete"Stay the hell away from him" doesn't sound to me like any sort of toying. The female boxer's trainer simply wanted to prevent the man's momentary peak power from going for a rushed knockout. Men score much higher at peak power than they do at average power, so wearing him off nerfed his strongest point and abolished any "cheap loss" risk the girl would otherwise be running. She may be able to beat him at his own game too, but I guess we 'll never get to know. Constantina
ReplyDeleteOn the Internet we often see how small women (or young girls) can defeat bigger, sometimes much bigger guys. But imagine how it is when guys meet women much taller and bigger than them. My cousin is very tall (6’4 or 193 cm) and visibly strong. She told me how, in occasions of conflict, the average guys are intimidated and even paralysed when they see they don’t have their unique advantage over women : size. She doesn’t need to fight, she just has to stand up and come close to the guy and the guy retreats. The guys are just not used to it so the intimidation works much better than when a big man does it.
ReplyDelete@blamat, I'm a taller than average male, so when I find myself standing next to a woman who is my size I can concur that it is indeed very intimidating to experience the presence of female power without my usual male size advantage. I am already aware of the many physical advantages a woman has even when she is smaller than me, but a woman who is my own size or bigger than me is simply overwhelming to my male ego. I can hold my own against another male my size, but there's a difference with a female. Maybe it's a woman's legs and hips which seem (and are) much stronger than a male's which make a woman seem so much more balanced and solid when compared with the 'top heavy' male body. Males have relatively weak legs and a higher center of gravity which makes us easier to knock down. A woman's body is built on a much more sturdy foundation with a larger more solid pelvis that can wreak havoc on a male.
DeleteI am a rather tall girl myself (178 cm) and I think it helped me realize more quickly that I could be stronger than men. Height is not very important for strength/fighting (in my opinion) but it gives you confidence. Do most girls on this website are tall ?
ReplyDeleteI'm also considered quite tall and it certainly helps in terms of strength, leverage and sheer intimidation. But I also know you don't have to be tall to be a tough girl. I know plenty of shorter muscle-packed girls who can rip any guy apart. Tasha
ReplyDeleteI only stand at 1,66m but that doesn't stop me from easy victories over guys in freestyle wrestling as well as armwrestling. I know of several women taller than 1,80m as well as several men below 1,65m - so you understand that we aren't as short a gender as we 're told to be. Don't buy the trick of showing the tallest men and the shortest women as "average" and "norm". And Tasha you 're right about many shorter girls being able to rip any guy apart. We have something men don't, I have no idea what it is, but surely enough it works wonders. Athena
DeleteWould you say that your legs are what you use most to beat guys? Girls always use their legs to win when I wrestle against them, even if they're capable of using just their upper body to overpower me. You might want to give Greco-Roman wrestling a try too. If you're able to easily dominate males in arm wrestling, then you would probably dominate them in that form of wrestling as well.
DeleteI don't care what part of my body I use most, I know I can use any part necessary, at any time. I understand there is enormous difference of leg strength in favour of women, though the point of freestyle is the ability to use any part at any time. I 've had a few wins in Greco-Roman as well, but I prefer freestyle because I like its freedom of choices. My wins in armwrestling are all due to guys challenging me. I tried refusing once, but I was called coward and thrown stuff at, so I changed my mind and taught everyone a lesson. Athena
DeleteWell done Athena! You sound like a great Amazon...
DeleteSorry to hear that you were harassed for refusing, but at least you showed them in the end. I've learned not to challenge girls to arm wrestling, and hopefully those guys did too.
DeleteThank you Xaan for your kind remark, but I am not the only one to teach the guys lessons on strength. All my friends have all their easy wins against guys. Moreover I do not ride a horse...
Delete21st, there will always be that one guy who thinks he can beat everyone. Until he challenges me or another girl from here, that is... Athena
You have a point, I don't think I've ever seen a guy give girls the respect they deserve until they learn from experience.
DeleteIndeed. Tell us if you ever happen to see one. I love positive progress signs. Alexia
DeleteHaha, I also used to think that guys can beat girls easily at arm wrestling, until one day, a girl from my class challenged me to arm wrestle(just for fun), We wrestled 3 times and all times I lost.
DeleteIt hurted my ego a lot, but we need to accept it, its ultimate truth that girls are better than boys at everything, studies, sports or whatever, they beat us.
It’s funny how men don’t take advantage of their bigger bodies or at least their size is not enough.
ReplyDeleteI do swimming at a competitive level in my university and last month at the pool, we, the female swimming team, were talking with the male team. They teased us by saying that professional women will never beat professional men because nature gave them significantly smaller feet (everything being equal, big feet gives a small edge because they work like palms. For instance, Ian Thorpe is size 54, Melissa Franklin size 46). They did a foot comparison to show us, and they had bigger feet than all of us. But then, the girl with the smallest feet challenged the boy with the biggest feet at 100m crawl, to prove them wrong. So it was size 39 vs size 48 and also a 20 cm difference, both of them were considered having a good swimming technique. She defeated him. She went out of the water laughing, she told him “Apparently clown feet is not enough ! Do you even know how to use them ?”. Angela
I would say it's our size not being enough, not that we don't want to take advantage of it. I wrestle girls with thinner arms and legs then I have, but they're still able to overpower me in tests of strength. I think girls are able to surpass us in sports because their muscles are more efficient and because their bodies as a whole are stronger than ours, even if we are stronger in one specific area.
DeleteWe are surpassing men for quite a pile of reasons, it isn't just one thing... Athena
DeleteAngela, I also got feet size mentionned to me. I made fun of a guy for his lack of flexibility during a yoga class and he said "ok, but thanks for my big wide feet I am sure I got a better balance than you". We tried the exercice where you have to stand on one leg and guess what he clearly did not have the better balance ^^
ReplyDeleteThat would be an easy guess, had you let us try it. In spite of the myth about men being able to stand better than us on one foot, I 've been through numerous various incidents where men were proved miserably unbalanced. In general, men like to have appointments with history, but somehow they 're always delayed by mythology. Alexia
DeleteExactly, their own mythology delays them from finally admitting their weaknesses. Athena
DeleteThank you for adding that extra precision to my point, Athena. You read much better than some others in here, don't you think so? Alexia
DeleteMale mythology is full of contradictions, just like everything about maleness. Masculine identity is built on lies and denials which are intended to hide our inner weakness. i think women have always known this. Now all the poorly woven threads of the fabric of patriarchy are unravelling and the whole unbalanced edifice will collapse. The future world in which Women have taken Their rightful place as leaders will be far better.
DeleteEven today the average woman is completely uninformed on this subject. Any conclusions drawn by experience alone can't be officially considered as knowledge. The best way to inform the uninformed is proper evidence. Thankfully this blog contains loads of it, although some gaps have yet to be filled as also pointed out by Constantina, if I remember well. Alexia
DeleteA few thoughts:
ReplyDeleteA girl in pigtails might look innocent but she will still destroy you.
Not only there were only 4 girls against 5 boys, but 2 of the 4 girls were white belts vs only 1 of the 5 boys.
The boys were genetically too unitelligent to think tactically al all. They just ran around like headless chickens and needed to be told what to do all the time. Without external help the girls' victory would have been even clearer.
Watching a yellow belt boy running scared of a white belt girl, then being smothered by her then run away scared again, this time disrobed and dispossesed of his yellow belt (like a symbolic castration) was very meaningful.
I have to agree. On so many levels the girls simply outperformed the boys, both individually and as a group. Very inspirational and I'm sure the girls will grow up more confident as they should do! Men have suppressed women for far too long. As for the boys, well I hope they too learn from the experience and respect women more as they grow up.
Delete